This is a good article that looks more closely at the old rule of thumb that we must write ten thousand hours before we achieve anything approaching mastery. Worth a read.
Theresa
1 comment:
Adrian
said...
A timely read for me, as I'm actively trying to find ways to "engineer my workplace" to increase my writing efficiency.
So far, I've found the best thing I can do is to unplug the network connection (literally) when I sit down to write. No email, no IM, no "quick" online searches for a synonym that always end up getting derailed into research and notes but very few words of prose.
I've abandoned do-it-all word processors in favor of a vanilla text editor. Everything (outline, notes, and text) for each project is in a single file. I delete the bits of outline as I write the prose. I delete the notes as I incorporate the ideas into the book. Those sections you know you should delete but can't bring yourself to destroy get pasted at the bottom of the file (after THE END). I can afford to be cavalier about deleting stuff, since I use programmers' "source control" tools to keep history.
Now, based on my success with the Hacker's Diet, I'm making a little program to track my progress. Having a graph that charts progress is a great motivator for me, and it also helps set realistic goals. I think the NanoWriMo people have something like it that plots word count over time. Mine tracks my writing time in addition to word count.
If you have an editing question you'd like us to address, feel free to send it to rasley at gmail dot com. We like reader questions because they save us from having to think up post topics on our own. ;)
Romance University Now Features Theresa in a Monthly Column! Click the Picture for Details
Our Promise to Authors
Every day we work with writers to shape their manuscripts for publication. We also evaluate submissions, read our friends’ pages, give second opinions to other editors -- in short, we confront a whole lot of manuscript pages for a whole lot of reasons. But here’s what we don’t do. We don’t -- and we never will -- pull examples directly from any of these manuscripts. The editor-author relationship depends on mutual trust and respect, and we won’t ever compromise that. We might get ideas for blog posts in the course of our interaction with writers and manuscripts, but all examples are ours, with the occasional exception of literary sources.
1 comment:
A timely read for me, as I'm actively trying to find ways to "engineer my workplace" to increase my writing efficiency.
So far, I've found the best thing I can do is to unplug the network connection (literally) when I sit down to write. No email, no IM, no "quick" online searches for a synonym that always end up getting derailed into research and notes but very few words of prose.
I've abandoned do-it-all word processors in favor of a vanilla text editor. Everything (outline, notes, and text) for each project is in a single file. I delete the bits of outline as I write the prose. I delete the notes as I incorporate the ideas into the book. Those sections you know you should delete but can't bring yourself to destroy get pasted at the bottom of the file (after THE END). I can afford to be cavalier about deleting stuff, since I use programmers' "source control" tools to keep history.
Now, based on my success with the Hacker's Diet, I'm making a little program to track my progress. Having a graph that charts progress is a great motivator for me, and it also helps set realistic goals. I think the NanoWriMo people have something like it that plots word count over time. Mine tracks my writing time in addition to word count.
Post a Comment